Appeals Court Says Uber and Lyft Must Treat California Drivers as Employees


OAKLAND, Calif. — Uber and Lyft should deal with their California drivers as workers, offering them with the advantages and wages they’re entitled to underneath state labor legislation, a California appeals court docket dominated Thursday.

The determination factors to rising settlement between the state courts and lawmakers that gig employees should not have the independence mandatory for them to be thought of contractors. But the California citizens will get to weigh in quickly, too, after they vote in lower than two weeks on a poll initiative sponsored by gig economic system start-ups to exempt themselves from the legislation.

The ruling by the California First District Court of Appeal is the results of a lawsuit introduced by the state’s lawyer basic and the town attorneys of San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Diego. The state and metropolis businesses sued the ride-hailing corporations in May to implement a brand new state labor legislation that aimed to make gig employees into workers.

“Every other employer follows the law,” Matthew Goldberg, deputy metropolis lawyer with the San Francisco City Attorney’s Office, instructed the appeals court docket throughout arguments final week. “This is dollars and wages and money that is being stolen from drivers by virtue of the misclassification.”

“When violation of statutory workplace protections takes place on a massive scale, as alleged in this case, it causes public harm over and above the private interest of any given individual,” the court wrote in its decision on Thursday.

State officials have argued that the companies must comply with the law, known as Assembly Bill 5, so that workers can obtain sick leave, overtime and other benefits — needs that have become especially pressing during the pandemic.

“This is a victory for the people of California and for every driver who has been denied fair wages, paid sick days, and other benefits by these companies,” San Francisco’s city attorney. Dennis Herrera, said in a statement. “The law is clear: Drivers can continue to have all of the flexibility they currently enjoy while getting the rights they deserve as employees. The only thing preventing that is Uber and Lyft’s greed.”

But Uber and Lyft have argued that they are technology companies, not transportation businesses. Employing drivers would force them to raise fares and hire only a small fraction of the drivers who currently work for them, they said.

The companies are sponsoring a state ballot initiative, Proposition 22, to exempt them from the law and allow them to continue classifying drivers as independent contractors, while providing them with limited benefits. The court gave Uber and Lyft a grace period in which to make changes, and if the ballot initiative is successful, it could throw the ruling into question.

“This ruling makes it more urgent than ever for voters to stand with drivers and vote yes on Prop. 22,” said Julie Wood, a spokeswoman for Lyft.



Source link Nytimes.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *